I recently read an article about a Michigan teacher who was
suspended for three days without pay because she allowed one of her middle
school students to play a song that supports gay marriage (Michigan TeacherSuspended for Letting Student Play Gay-Themed Song in Class).
One of the other students in the class was offended by the song and reported it
to administration and the teacher was punished. I’m not sure if the school
understands the message that they sent to the teacher and all of her students:
teaching about being tolerant of gay people is offensive and has no place in
the classroom. I’m sure that is not the intended message, but that is how it
seems. I’m assuming the school has a zero tolerance policy because those can be
over the top sometimes. The song did use the word “faggot.” Perhaps that
violated the school rules. If so, then I hope the school is fully enforcing
that rule. I hope every time “gay” is used as an insult in that building and
every time any student dares to utter the word “faggot,” consequences are swift
and appropriate.
I read the article and I wondered what the other students in
the class thought about the song. I wondered how the kid who played the song
felt. I wondered if the class had a discussion about the song or if they just
listened to it and moved on. The song is a good teaching moment for any class
because there are so many things in it that can be discussed. The teacher didn’t
have to say what was right or wrong, but she could have facilitated a class
discussion. The school suspended Johnson because the song contained “controversial
content, including homosexuality, religion, political views, and a sexual slur.”
I wonder if the school even cared about the message. Most middle school
students can go see PG-13 movies without their parents. If the same ratings
were applied to songs, “Same Love” would probably be PG, but at its worst, it
would be PG-13. The content might be controversial, but it isn’t inappropriate
for middle school kids and it wasn’t the teacher who wanted to present the song
to the class, it was a student. I’m sure there was a reason why the student
selected that song. I could understand the outrage if the song had been profanity
laced or made vulgar references, but none of that is there. I have included the
song below so that you can judge for yourself:
No comments:
Post a Comment